Obama Tries To Avoid Conflict To Delay The Inevitable

Rumsfeld calls Obama’s Syria strategy ‘mindless’

Obama Tries To Avoid Conflict To Delay The Inevititable

Image courtesy of [Naypong] / FreeDigitalPhotos.net 

Former Defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld says he’s confounded by how the Obama administration has gone about explaining why a strike is in the USA’s national interest.

“There really hasn’t been any indication from the administration as to what our national interest is with respect to this particular situation,” Rumsfeld, secretary of Defense when the U.S. attacked Iraq in 2003, said Wednesday evening on the Fox Business Network.

The most important issues in the region, Rumsfeld said, are “Iran’s nuclear program and the relationship between Iran and Syria — the (Bashar) Assad regime — with respect to funding terrorists that go around killing innocent men, women and children, including Americans.”

Rumsfeld, who under President George W. Bush helped plan and manage the U.S. war in Iraq, also sharply criticized President Obama and his aides’ approach for making clear to the regime that any potential military action would be limited in its focus.

In an interview with PBS NewsHour on Wednesday, Obama, who made his opposition to the Iraq war a central part of his 2008 presidential run, said he was not interested in getting involved in an open-ended conflict in Syria.

“The idea of demystifying for the enemy what you’re going to do is mindless,” Rumsfeld said. “I can’t imagine what they’re thinking.”

Obama said on Wednesday that he has not yet decided what action he’ll take against the Assad regime, which the administration has concluded deployed chemical weapons on Aug. 21 on the outskirts of Damascus.

But the president suggested that he believes limited military action could result in Assad ceasing the use of chemical weapons.

Read More